17 years ago 5,418
100% (13 votes)
Share:
link-to-this-photo:

Comments (8)

or signup to post comments!
zad515's Avatar
zad515 15 years ago

This pic is of me from a while ago (before I did PE). I'll put some more up since the jury seems to be out on this pic...

0
meatpackingbubba's Avatar
meatpackingbubba 17 years ago

damn jaded size queens

0
LongJohnny's Avatar
LongJohnny 17 years ago

Interested in all the narky put-down comments that appear on this site (garrytt is the king of the snide-queens) and wonder just what dimensions these guys have. Pretty tiny, I wouldn't mind betting. Their comments are a psychological giveaway.

0
steve2009's Avatar
steve2009 17 years ago

although its long I prefer girth,

0
rbezahl's Avatar
rbezahl 17 years ago

There is nothing special

0
chetsz15feet's Avatar
chetsz15feet 17 years ago

this thing is not small. 8 inches up top is about twice the length of the average dick. Average is more like 5.5 *measured along the bottom*. This is def. for size hounds (and queens). Mexmuscle is being snarky sarcastic (I'm glad) 'cause so many picky assholes and bitches on this site cut perfectly good stuff down. Looks skinny btw because it's so long. He's prob. 10" measured along bottom. Matt Hughes is an inch longer up top. Only an inch. This thing is a tree branch.

0
coxman's Avatar
coxman 17 years ago

A really nice 8 incher...I'd love to hav it. Nothing to turn away, man. Beautiful tool.

0
garrytt's Avatar
garrytt 17 years ago

the tape-measure nearly covers the thing up: not much girth, there.

0