@jwc83: Aside from the 'Troll' bit, your comment was reasonable & worthy of consideration--until the very end. Calling that guy's dick the " 'creme de la creme' bar none" made nonsense of everything you'd just said. You destroyed your own point.
Leo Alexander has what's sometimes called 'a porn dick'--meaning definitely a lot bigger than most guys--but that doesn't necessarily amount to monstercok size.
Probably 75 to 80% of the guys seen here DO have monsters, but not Leo. (Besides, although it's not strictly relevant to this site, his looks are only so-so at best.)
So, jwc83, no need to get so hissy/huffy & calling people trolls. Jayson was just telling the truth.
so, Troll, ...Leo Alexander doesn't qualify in your book. I'd like to see what kind of King Kong dicks you would consider a "monster-cock" if his is not. As far as I'm concerned, his is the creme de la creme, bar none. :P
@jwc83: Aside from the 'Troll' bit, your comment was reasonable & worthy of consideration--until the very end. Calling that guy's dick the " 'creme de la creme' bar none" made nonsense of everything you'd just said. You destroyed your own point.
Leo Alexander has what's sometimes called 'a porn dick'--meaning definitely a lot bigger than most guys--but that doesn't necessarily amount to monstercok size.
Probably 75 to 80% of the guys seen here DO have monsters, but not Leo. (Besides, although it's not strictly relevant to this site, his looks are only so-so at best.)
So, jwc83, no need to get so hissy/huffy & calling people trolls. Jayson was just telling the truth.
so, Troll, ...Leo Alexander doesn't qualify in your book. I'd like to see what kind of King Kong dicks you would consider a "monster-cock" if his is not. As far as I'm concerned, his is the creme de la creme, bar none. :P
Nice-looking guys, good action--but sorry, no monstercock on view.